There has been a whole lot of hoopla surrounding Instagram’s newly updated terms of services, with commenters warning the new rules might give the popular Facebook-owned photography service the right to share your data with third-parties and – worse – sell your Instagram photos without compensating you. Does Facebook really intend to turn Instagram into a stock photo service that doesn’t pay a dime to photographers?
Cowed by privacy outrage, hours after releasing the new terms the company’s co-founder responded by shedding more light on the matter. In a blog post, he makes it clear that Instagram does not intend to sell its users photos while sharing interesting tidbits concerning Instagram’s advertising strategy…
Co-founder Kevin Systrom writes in a blog post:
Instagram users own their content and Instagram does not claim any ownership rights over your photos. We respect that your photos are your photos. Period.
By the way, you may still appear in ads because “from the start, Instagram was created to become a business”.
Relax. The chances of Instagram using your underexposed fish taco pictures are extremely slim.
— Sebastien Page (@SebastienPage) December 18, 2012
However, Instagram has no plans to make your photos part of an advertisement so it’s going to “remove the language that raised the question”.
Two things: 1. I’d like to see the drop rate for Instagram over past 24 hrs. and 2. Response was very well done blog.instagram.com/post/382521354…
— cody lee (@melvco) December 18, 2012
Are we sure they said it’s not their intention to sell our photos or did they say it’s “not not not not not not not not our intention”?
— MG Siegler (@parislemon) December 18, 2012
There you have it.
@dujkan Yeah, I’m no lawyer, but have some experience with image licensing. Perfect storm of inflammatory language.
— Matthew Panzarino (@panzer) December 18, 2012
If Instagram really cared about the Internet, they would have waited till the Xmas-new year’s dead zone, when we really need a one-day story
— Peter Kafka (@pkafka) December 18, 2012
So, just how exactly does Facebook expect to monetize Instagram with ads?
Let’s say a business wanted to promote their account to gain more followers and Instagram was able to feature them in some way. In order to help make a more relevant and useful promotion, it would be helpful to see which of the people you follow also follow this business.
The upcoming data sharing with Facebook should help with that.
This bit is important.
In this way, some of the data you produce — like the actions you take (eg, following the account) and your profile photo — might show up if you are following this business.
In order to bring clarity to today’s brouhaha, Instagram will once again update its terms of service to “modify specific parts of the terms to make it more clear what will happen with your photos”. The new terms will take effect 30 days from now.
Pretty sure Instagram will reverse their policy changes soon, which are BS, though. They’d basically be ruining themselves.
And in case you were wondering, nothing has changed concerning your privacy settings on Instagram. Photos set to private remain private and Instagram only shares your photos with the people you’ve approved to follow you.
If I’m reading this correctly, Instagram wants to use your data for advertising purposes by showing friends what brands/companies you follow
— Steve Kovach (@stevekovach) December 18, 2012
Hopefully this eliminates the confusion so we can all put the matter to rest.
Vent your frustration down in the comments.
This article is brought to you by Duet Display, an awesome app that turns your iPhone or iPad into an extra display for your Mac or PC. Get it now in the App Store.