Apple’s focus on wearables apparently includes medical biosensing and iris scanning

By , Jan 17, 2014

Sensor Tatoo (image 001)

If a new report by a very reliable blogger is anything to go by, Apple’s rumored wearable project is seeking to mainstream medical sensor technology and health biosensing via monitoring your blood chemistry. Evidence proves that earlier this year the company poached two high-profile biosensor experts from medical devices firms.

These people, who joined the iWatch hardware team, bring expertise in mobile medical technologies focused on reading and analyzing blood and glucose levels via a potentially disruptive technology that uses a painless patch which works on the arm and doesn’t require a needle.

Apple’s interest in blood monitoring through skin is interesting in light of the rumored iWatch wearable device, even more so considering Google’s latest initiative – Smart Contact Lenses that measure glucose levels in tears.

Furthermore, the iPhone maker is said to be “actively investigating” iris scanning technology. As we wrote before, Samsung is said to be exploring iris scanning for the upcoming Galaxy S5. This is your TL;DR version, the full analysis and detailed context continues…

Mark Gurman of 9to5Mac has a nice scoop on Apple’s recent hiring of Sano Intelligence hardware developer Nancy Dougherty and Vital Connect’s Ravi Narasimhan. Both are biometric sensor experts with electrical engineering degrees from Stanford.

Nancy Dougherty

Nancy Dougherty (pictured above), who worked for the Sano Intelligence, is a bit of a mystery as the startup hasn’t launched a product yet. According to profiles by both The New York Times and Fast Company, she was the hardware developer of a tiny arm patch that uses needle-less technologies to read and analyze blood chemistry.

Sano’s prototype can measure glucose and potassium levels and will soon be able to monitor “everything you might find on a basic metabolic panel–a blood panel that measures glucose levels, kidney function, and electrolyte balance,” the profiles read.

It’s possible Apple is looking to incorporate this biosensor into the iWatch.

Check out a screenshot of her LinkedIn profile, a richer version from Google cache.

Nancy Dougherty (LinkedIn profile)

Before joining Sano, she worked at Proteus Digital Health on a Bluetooth device which monitors heart rate, respiration, motion and temperature.

As for Ravi Narasimhan, seen below, Apple poached him from general medical devices company called Vital Connect. As their Vice President of Research and Development, he was tasked with “biosensor technology and algorithms for remote physiological monitoring with wearable medical devices”.

Ravi Narasimhan

According to his public LinkedIn profile, Narasimhan holds over “40 patents granted and over 15 pending,” many of which cover various medical sensors, including patents for measuring the respiratory rate and the body’s position in space to tell if a person has fallen.

We can only speculate whether or not Narasimhan’s and Dougherty’s work for their respective former employers is directly related to the iWatch project. What these hirings suggest, in Gurman’s own words, is that Apple is “growing its team of medical sensor specialists by hiring some of the world’s most forward-thinking experts in seamless mobile medical technologies”.

Gurman also learned from sources that Apple is “actively investigating iris scanning technology,” but wouldn’t elaborate further. Gurman’s track record in terms of rumor reporting is excellent, by the way.

As for the rumored iWatch, you can count on one thing: Apple will not introduce it until it is ready. I think we’re way past the rumor stage as Tim Cook & Co. have been poaching some of the world’s top biometric and wearable experts left and right over the past 24 months.

iWatch C (on wrist, Martin Hajek 001)
iWatch C concept via Martin Hajek.

Not only these engineers don’t come cheap, their fields of expertise have absolutely nothing to do with Apple’s core businesses – computers, phones and tablets – so clearly there’s enough smoke to make us think there’s a fire.

Some watchers like Jason O’Grady criticize Apple of losing steam in the innovation department to Google’s recent strides.

Cupertino needs to reassure its developers and customers that it’s still relevant in 2014, or they’ll simply jump back in their self-driving cars, read news updates on heads up displays, and start dinner, laundry and feeding their pets remotely as they commute back to their climate controlled homes.

Yeah, O’Grady is a harsh critic.

The Internet giant, among other things, developed autonomous vehicles and bandwidth by hot air balloons. But more importantly, Google is after so-called moonshot projects – that is, initiatives which have the potential to disrupt whole industries much in the same way the iPhone turned the wireless and phone industries upside down.

Yesterday, Google said it is now testing a smart contact lens which contains a tiny wireless chip that measures glucose levels in tears, photographed below. The prototype also includes a miniaturized glucose sensor embedded between the two layers of soft contact lens material.

Google Smart Contact Lens (closeup 001)

“We’re testing prototypes that can generate a reading once per second,” the company wrote in a blog post. “We’re also investigating the potential for this to serve as an early warning for the wearer, so we’re exploring integrating tiny LED lights that could light up to indicate that glucose levels have crossed above or below certain thresholds.”

By the way, Google’s smart contact lens sensor is old news for Microsoft, here’s a Microsoft Research video from 2011.

More importantly, Google earlier this week unexpectedly bought a hot Silicon Valley startup Nest which employs over a hundred former Apple engineers and sells smart thermostat and smoke detector devices for the Smart Home of the future.

The brains behind the Nest devices and company co-founder and CEO: the brilliant engineer Tony Fadell, who headed the iPod music player project over seventeen generations and participated in iPhone development.

Google Nest

I postulated why Apple didn’t put up a fight and didn’t even bid.

This has led writer Walter Isaacson, who penned the official bio book on Steve Jobs, to caution that Google is now stealing the innovation crown from Apple. The Internet of Things is actually real, he said, adding that Google’s going to get ahead of that game.

Here’s an excerpt from Isaacon’s TV interview with CNBC:

The greatest innovation today is coming from Google. Fadell was one of the team that created the iPod. He was very deep into the Apple culture when Apple was so innovative. Now Tony Fadell is going to Google because he’s part of the Nest deal.

Isaacson liked Steve Jobs because he “was a disruptor,” but now questions Tim Cook’s ability to lead Apple to its next disruptive thing.

Cook’s got to say ‘What am I going to disrupt? Is it going to be wearables? Is it going to be a watch? Is it going to be TV?’. We ought to see, in 2014, Apple do something huge.

We heard Cook say repeatedly that “big things” are coming in 2014.

During June 2013 earnings call Cook told investors that “we’ve got really great stuff coming across all of 2014″.

Tim Cook (China Mobile launch, Beijing store)

The following quarter, the CEO reiterated his belief that Apple has the skills to create “great products” in categories it’s not currently participating in, an indication of new Apple product categories coming in 2014.

Also this in an email to troops last month:

We have a lot to look forward to in 2014, including some big plans that we think customers are going to love.

And earlier today, Cook was present at the opening of a store in Beijing to celebrate the iPhone launch on China Mobile (see the shot above). He even posed for fan photographs and signed some customers’ iPhone boxes.

iPhone 5s (Tim Cook autograph)

Of course the media pressed him on future products, to which Cook responded, according to The New York Times:

We never talk about future things. We have great things we are working on but we want to keep them secret. That way you will be so much happier when you see it.

It all makes sense now, doesn’t it?

We’re indeed living in very interesting times, though pessimists might point out that ‘may you live in interesting times’ is actually an ancient Chinese proverb and curse.

Anyways, what do you think Apple’s next big thing should be: a gadget worn on the body, a full-on television set, an iPhablet, a larger-screen iPad or something entirely different?

Pictured top of post: a temporary sensor tattoo which, coupled with the iPhone’s camera, can read the levels of sodium, glucose and even alcohol in your system.

  • Share:
  • Follow:
  • OhSixTJ

    This is a win for people who suffer from diabetes.

    • jack

      Cure would be a win.. Not just another method of measuring blood sugar

      • Rowan09

        There is no cure so it would be a win. In all honesty there’s no such thing as a cure because if you can get it again it’s just a treatment until the body can defend itself.

      • Hyr3m

        Preventing millions of people from getting diabetes because of poisons allowed by the FDA and other Codex Alimentarius bs would be a win :D
        Apple will sell your blood-related data if they can…

      • Rowan09

        Wishing I had a million would also be a win for me but I don’t. We are talking about reality not some made up world so this would be helpful for those with diabetes and other illnesses.

      • Hyr3m

        You said a cure would be a win. My point was that preventing most people from getting diabetes in the first place would be even better than a cure (hence a bigger win). What the FDA and food/drinks-producing corporations did in the past ~40 years is the direct cause of the current huge rise in diabetes.

        That’s reality.

        What we (/corporations/government?) need to do first is not help monitor the sugar levels of those that have diabetes. The first thing to do is : stop poisoning people !

        But yeah… I’ll take a million $ too while you’re at it :D

      • Rowan09

        Lol. I agree but all that matters to the rich is money and using cheap ingredients, pesticides, etc saves them money.

      • Hyr3m

        Georgia Guidestones say it’s not just about money… Just like the reason for nuclear power plants to use uranium instead of thorium.
        Power is not just about money… (some of) the power-hungry think of everyone else as slaves and as such, think they should hold power of life and death among other privileges (controlling what we feel, what we think and what we do about those feelings and thoughts)…
        Thankfully, they’re not as powerful as they claim to be (and they know it… so they keep pushing).

  • LOL

    Next thing you know, when people are doing drugs, it’ll alert the authorities…..

    • blastingbigairs

      If it’s people abusing our welfare system then I’m all for that!!!

  • ConduciveMammal

    What’s “TL;DR”?

    And if Apple do being out an iPhablet, I hope to God that they don’t ever refer to it as a “Phablet”, it’s such a horribly cheap and tacky monicker.

    • Jeremy

      TL;DR = too long; didn’t read

      It’s for the lazy people who aren’t interested enough to read the whole thing.

  • D1squs

    Humanity is getting closer and closer from being cyborg..

    • jack

      The previous “revolution” was computers… the next is this cyborg thing (genetics, etc)

    • Carlos Gomes

      Yay to cyber tramps – finally!

  • Snailpo

    Great post really covered everything!

  • David Jensen

    What people fail to see is that Apple hasn’t stopped innovating.. Lets think back just a few years?

    2001 was the year of the iPod
    2007 was the year of the iPhone
    2010 was the year of the iPad

    So 6 years between the iPod and the iPhone and 3 years between the iPhone and the iPad.

    We are now 4 years since they introduced the iPad, (their lates new category release). I would say that 2014-2015 would be the perfect year(s), compared to what we have seen in 2000 and ahead, to “innovate” and come out with something completely new.

    Innovation don’t happen over night.. The lack of faith in Apple is due to media and nothing more. Even the Mac Pro was innovation in the ‘pro desktop’ category, cheers!

    • Hyr3m

      The iPod was not “something new” : mp3 players with better sound quality, more space, easier and more open file transfer capabilities existed before the iPod. What made the iPod different from the rest of them was shameless marketing.
      The iPhone was not really “something new” either. They went for “no keyboard” and used existing multitouch principles. It was a bet and they won it. It’s still not really innovation.
      The iPad was definitely not something new. Tablet computers existed before that and they were capable of much more than any iOS tablet ever was.
      Purchasing existing technology to put it in your device is not innovation, it’s business.

      • David Jensen

        Call it whatever you like, but in my opinion what Apple does is innovation. When you take something either new or old prefect it and take the world by storm thats innovation. Who cares if I or you invent something cool in our basements, if no one uses it?
        No matter how hard you try, it won’t change the history my friend. The iPod, iPhone and iPad as I wrote about will stay in the history for a long, long time as innovative and revolutionary new devices when they came out.

        Apple will not stop doing this for a long time either! I’m sure we’re all gonna se allot of new cool stuff from them!

        Cheers! =)

      • Hyr3m

        History will look back at Apple and say how irresponsible and damaging Apple has been for the IT industry, for the planet and for privacy.
        The iPod’s only “innovation” was the click-wheel. That’s a user input and it’s neither the best nor the most lasting. You want innovation in user input that people will remember ? Think “mouse” or “leap motion” (/kinect).
        Another thing Apple will be remembered for is marketing. It’s the only thing they’re really good at. It’s 100% of what made the iPod what people (like you) think it was.
        The revolution you speak of is a revolting “ecosystem” that binds people to Apple through a pseudo-monopoly of their data (for which Apple should get sued like Microsoft was regarding wmp and ie in the mid-late 90s). Now every other company does the same shyte because it seems to be acceptable. That’s why Apple is so bad for the industry, for developers and for end-users in an era that was becoming increasingly open, fair, secure and private. History will remember this and there’s nothing I or you can do about it.

  • Laszlo Gaspar

    An iWatch that could read your glucose levels, heart rate etc.., would be really cool and useful.

    • Rowan09

      That would be a huge revolution for Apple because hospitals would purchase a lot.

    • http://www.igielda.com/ Artur Bardo

      Will be great if iWatch can check alcohol level in your blad to let you know if you can drive next day to work or call taxi.

  • Steve Jobs

    Necessity is the mother of invention.