iWatch cocept (Martin Hajek, MacUser April 2013 issue 001)

Despite there being no product nor confirmation from Apple that it will offer one, a high-profile Apple analyst is estimating the iPhone maker could sell between five and ten million iWatch units in the first year. According to Piper Jaffray Gene Munster’s survey of 799 U.S. consumers, some twelve percent of U.S. iPhone owners said they might pay $350 on Apple’s watch, if it materializes.

The survey follows Samsung’s attempt to beat Apple to the smartphone punch, introducing its $299 Galaxy Gear in advertisements. For Apple, the iWatch lives only in patents filed and registered trademarks. Munster, of the ‘Apple TV is just around the corner’ fame, follows another analyst who believes the iWatch could be an even bigger hit…

Although 88 percent of Munster’s survey of 799 U.S. iPhone owners (via Fortune) said they’d pass on the iWatch, that didn’t stop the analyst from doing some back-of-the-envelope profit projections and sharing his findings with investors.

His math:

If you assume that Apple sells 7.5 million units in the first year (midpoint of our 5-10 million unit range) at an average selling price of $350 and a 30 percent gross margin, it would increase our 2014 revenue estimates by $2.6 billion or one percent and gross profit dollars by $790 million or one percent.

While that sounds impressive, Munster believes the iWatch would not be “a likely needle-mover for Apple in terms of revenue in 2014.”

Earlier this year, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty also attempted to decipher how well an iWatch might sell. She based her estimate on the roughly half billion iTunes accounts, figuring that Apple could sell 50-150 million iWatches each year, or ten times Munster’s numbers.


While component makers would love to see Apple produce another device and Wall Street observers would enjoy tracking yet another Apple line, so far there are only rumors and conjecture – a bit like the Apple TV talk that’s been floating around for years.

The connection is not lost on Munster, often criticized for his fascination with vaporware.

We put it [the iWatch] in a similar category as the television in that it could demonstrate Apple’s ability to innovate (good for the multiple) and potentially lead to a more meaningful new product category in wearable tech.

In the meantime, Samsung is banking on its first-mover advantage by aggressively pitching its $299 Galaxy Gear smartwatch, despite not so favorable reviews.

  • Cameron Chao

    So, does anyone have the Galaxy Gear watch? care to let us know what they think?

    • bigtalk

      nope only folks who have it are folks who bought the surface and zuuuuun

    • ɑղժɾҽա

      No one wants a Galaxy Gear.

  • Mohammed Sahib

    The idea when they introduced the iPhone is unite 3 devices into one: iPod, phone and internet communicator. Many people do not want to carry,and pay for that matter, many devices with them. They want one device to do it all. So unless the iWatch can replace the iPhone, it doesn’t make sense, to me at least.

    • CA$H

      It’s just a pointless thing if you’ve got an iPhone to try and make them billions

    • Rowan09

      I’m in the market for a smart watch because I like wearing a watch. If my watch can also send text messages, alert me of notifications I wouldn’t mind. I don’t want to pay $350 for an iWatch though that’s just too much unless it looks like a luxury watch.

  • Ishaan Malhotra

    Maybe if a good watch brand makes it and implements ios into their watch, i’d buy it.

    • bigtalk

      not gonna happen

  • beowulf

    We must also remember that when it comes to Apple, Munster is more often wrong than right.

  • Obsidian71

    I don’t see the value of another device that must be worn, charged and managed. Consumer fatigue is about to settle in.

    • bigtalk

      yeah the better life better be 4 weeks.. – it needs to charge by kinetic energy and solar energy to achieve this

  • iGOD

    Of course, if Apple is selling sh**t, iFan would still buy it with a high price.
    That’s why their profits are high.

  • Tony

    Anything over 150.00 and I’m out. You can get an iPad mini for 329.00 so why pay higher for a watch?

    • bigtalk

      i see 199 and 299