Apple’s legal battle with Qualcomm over excessive smartphone royalties has taken a turn for the worse as several Apple suppliers have officially sided with their key client to allege that Qualcomm has violated two sections of the U.S. antitrust law.

Taiwan-based contract manufacturers Compal, Foxconn, Pegatron and Wistron filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm late Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the aforementioned suppliers are arguing that Qualcomm’s licensing practices with them are illegal. Apple is covering their legal fees.

Their filing accuses Qualcomm of charging excessive patent licenses for cellular technology.

In a a nutshell, Qualcomm has attempted to force the companies which assemble iPhones and iPads for Apple and other gadgets for other brands to pay license fees to it.

The suppliers have the direct licensing agreements with Qualcomm that cover iPhones and iPads. After they stopped paying royalties on Apple’s behalf, Qualcomm sued them over the nonpayment saying its licensing agreements with the suppliers are independent of Apple.

Qualcomm, of course, says its licensing practices are fair. The company’s argument is that Apple is merely attempting to reduce its costs at a time of slowing iPhone shipments.

Here’s what’s at the heart of the matter, according to the write-up:

Complaints against Qualcomm have focused on its licensing practices for patents considered essential to cellular communication. Standards organizations require such patents be licensed widely at fair costs, but critics say Qualcomm has made sales of its chips conditional on the purchase of a patent license and refuses to make its essential technology available to rival chip makers. It has also been accused of charging high royalty rates unless smartphone makers agree to buy its chips.

Monday, Qualcomm CEO said he expects the dispute to be settled out of court.

Apple also said it filed a separate motion Tuesday to consolidate its suppliers’ countersuit and its own suit against Qualcomm. Of course, Qualcomm immediately fired back by counter-suing Apple in Germany over alleged patent infringement, asking regulators to stop “Apple’s sale and importation of the latest iPhones in Germany”.

Earlier in July, Qualcomm sought to block imports of some Apple devices into the United States, including iPhones that use cellular modem chips from Intel, not Qualcomm.

  • Rowan09

    Wealthy people problems.

    • Mark S

      No, wealthy CORPORATION problems.

      • Rowan09

        No the people going to fight in court are all wealthy. The employees aren’t involved in the fight, so it is wealthy people problems as well.

  • techfreak23

    “…Qualcomm sought to block imports of some Apple devices into the United States, including iPhones that use cellular modem chips from Intel, not Qualcomm.”

    Where the hell does Qualcomm get off? Are they implying that Intel is also infringing on their patents with their modems???

    • Mark S

      Maybe intel could sue also? Come one everyone let’s put qualcomm in receivership now!

      • Rowan09

        Maybe I should short Qualcomm stock

    • TechnoBuff

      Everyone protects their property .. Apple of all company knows that. How come when it comes to Apple everyone goes up in arms against the other party.

      • Rowan09

        This isn’t about protecting it’s about charging too much since you are needed. The courts will decide who is right

      • TechnoBuff

        And Apple does not charge too much or try to undercut its suppliers!!!!!
        Qualcomm holds strong intellectual properties.. Apple does same or even worse. Let us call a spade a spade.

      • Rowan09

        What company does Appel supply things to at an unfair rate (never knew they even supplied anything)? Qualcomm is even trying to stop iPhone without its tech how is this right? I don’t know the details or care to know but why is it anytime Apple is in a lawsuit it’s always call a spade a spade?

      • techfreak23

        Umm I wasn’t arguing that Apple is completely innocent or that Qualcomm shouldn’t protect their IP. That quote was talking about them trying to have a sales ban on the GSM models of the 7 that use Intel’s modem… that’s an overreach, unless they end up suing Intel for infringing on their patented tech, only then would they have reason to include those devices as well.

  • Mark S

    Sharks smell the blood.

  • Iskren Donev

    I’m not entirely sure that this is a turn for the worse. You know how the cellular iPads cost $130 more? The vast majority of that money goes in licensing fees to Qualcomm.