Apple Watch Craftsmanship sapphire Edition 001

After putting the stainless steel Apple Watch through a barrage of excruciating screen benchmarks, display expert Raymond Soneira of DisplayMate Technologies has determined that its sapphire protection actually degrades image quality.

But it’s not Apple’s fault, really. Even though sapphire is the second-hardest transparent material after diamond, the substance suffers from a higher reflectance versus a less expensive ion-strengthened glass utilized on the entry-level aluminum Apple Watch Sport as well as the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus devices.

Because sapphire doesn’t perform as well in high ambient light and at large viewing angles compared to the traditional glass, DisplayMate has determined that the sapphire coating found on the Apple Watch and Apple Watch Edition “significantly affects the optical performance” of the screen.

In terms of numbers, the sapphire cover reflected about 8.2 percent of light in DisplayMate’s tests versus a reflectance of 4.6 percent for the more affordable Ion-X glass used on the Apple Watch Sport.

By reflecting more light, the screens on higher-end Apple Watch models increase mirror reflections and color shifting while reducing contrast, thus degrading image quality versus the Sport model.

Our own Sebastien Page was able to attest to this, saying that “it’s hard to see anything” on the Apple Watch screen in bright sunlight.

Apple Watch Sport flying 002

Part of the problem is the aggressive Apple Watch brightness control that automatically reduces brightness in stronger ambient light to preserve the battery, thus impacting contrast and color gamut.

In other words, the mid and high-range Apple Watch and Apple Watch Edition models reflect about twice as much ambient light as the Ion-X-enabled Sport version of the gadget. You could say the Apple Watch Sport has better display than pricier models, at least in terms of reflectance.

For what it’s worth, “Apple has done an excellent job in optically bonding the sapphire to the OLED display without an air gap,” said Soneira. Apple’s first OLED screen provides “very nice, pleasing and accurate colors and picture quality.”

However, “the Reflectance of the iPhone 6 with Ion-X cover glass is only 4.6 percent, so the Apple Watch with a sapphire crystal reflects 178 percent of the amount of light reflected by the iPhone 6.”

Apple Watch Craftsmanship Ion-X Glass

On the other hand, the mid-range Apple Watch and the high-end Apple Watch Edition both are more scratch resistant than the entry-level Apple Watch Sport due to their sapphire crystal screen.

DisplayMate was impressed with an OLED panel used across all Apple Watch models, describing the screen inside the 42mm Apple Watch as “excellent”. They estimated the pixel density of the 42mm Retina screen to be between 322 and 326 pixels per inch, roughly the same as the iPhone’s.

The screen is running with full 24-bit color.

Apple Watch (Retina display 001)

Overall, the OLED panel on all Watch models has roughly the same colors, color calibration and color accuracy as the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus.

The Ion-X glass used for the entry-level aluminum Apple Watch Sport is five times stronger than regular glass, according to Apple.

From the Apple Watch Craftsmanship webpage on the company’s website:

Ion-X glass is the same material used in the windows of space shuttles and high-speed trains. This glass is thin and light, yet surprisingly strong — five times stronger than regular glass. Which made it the perfect choice for Apple Watch Sport. There are many ways to strengthen glass at the surface, but Ion-X glass is hardened down to its molecules.

During the manufacturing process, the glass is dipped in a 750-degree molten potassium salt bath. That’s when ion exchange takes place, with the smaller sodium ions being removed from the glass and replaced by larger potassium ions. As the glass cools, these larger ions create an extremely hard surface layer that is resistant to scratches and impact.

So there you go.

It would have been perfect if the industry had found a way to couple the hardness and protection of the sapphire to the low reflectance of the ion-strengthened glass, but this isn’t feasible with today’s manufacturing technology.

As Soneira himself put it, the sapphire industry will need to “modify the optical properties of sapphire without significantly affecting its scratch resistance and other mechanical properties.”

Unfortunately, “it can’t be done using traditional anti-reflection optical coatings which scratch easily,” so sadly you can’t have it both ways.

After analyzing Apple’s sapphire with a diamond tester, YouTube ‘Unbox Therapy’ has concluded that the sapphire coating on the Apple Watch screen matches up the sapphire used by traditional watchmakers like Tissot on their high-end analog watches.

Source: DisplayMate

  • Thomas

    the second hardest transparent material next to a diamond is moissanite

    • Brandon

      i dont think Apple feels like mining meteorites since its pretty much non-existent naturally on Earth lol

      • Hi

        LOL

      • Thomas

        Moissanite is man made constantly , I wasn’t saying apple should use this, I was simply stating a fact, that moisanite IS the second hardest material nextt to a diamond

      • Brandon

        im not going to pretend to be an expert, but its extremely difficult & expensive to produce, there’s only 1 supplier of it globally, and it still scratches from what I can find.

      • Thomas

        we talking about moissanite ? or sapphire ? and regardless i am getting the apple watch, I was simply stating the moissanite is harder, the mohs scale ( the scale used to determine hardness of diamonds sapphire etc) moisanite is 9.25 diamond is 10 and sapphire is 9

    • Maxim∑

      and guess what? somewhere in space is a unknown material harder than diamond so screw off

      • Thomas

        hahah why are you insulting me over me stating a fact? again I didnt say apple should use this

      • Maxim∑

        well they won’t let me know when you realize the impact it will have on manufacturing for a WHOPPING .25+ in hardness And the refractive Index is over 2x higher than sapphire so please

        remember there is a display under it, and people like to see the display

      • Thomas

        ummm what ? I don’t think you know how to read, if you could, you would see the words, I DIDNT SAY APPLE SHOULD USE MOISSANITE, just stating the fact its harder, but continue on

      • JayDee917

        Sorry Thomas, but meet the “fanboys.”

        Any time you say anything that could remotely be taken as a knock towards an Apple product, it will be taken personally as a sign of blatant disrespect.

        Even facts can be insulting to them when they contradict “facts” made by Apple.

        At least you know now.

      • Thomas

        hahaha I see that ! I know they took it personally like it was a personal attack, When I said, I didnt say apple should use mossiante and I am getting the apple watch,

      • I totally got what you meant the first time. Some fanboys just can’t think straight right now, with their lame Watch on their wrist.

  • Charlie

    Well, this isn’t going to stop people from buying an Apple Watch. If they want it they will still buy a sports one

    • Thomas

      I am not trying to stop people from buying the apple watch, I am buying the apple watch, just stating a simple fact is all

      • coLin

        he wasn’t replying to you, lol. he was referring to the article

    • Time for them to invent a new word for a holes wearing an Apple Watch. Sorta like how jerkoffs with Google Glasses had a nickname.

  • Jamessmooth

    Two choices: deal with reflectiveness but no scratching, or not as reflective but chance of scratching the display. Can’t have it all, I guess!

    • Gary LE

      I would definitely go with sapphire even with the glare lol. Besides if u turn up brightness higher then it will have less glare. Btw some people get side track on reading and commenting on articles. Lol so funny.

  • Eni

    No one cares