iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus are “precision‑engineered to resist water and dust,” in Apple’s own words, as is the flagship iPhone X model, but the company has not increased water resistance of the new phones as some were hoping it would.

According to Apple’s iPhone X and iPhone 8 webpages, the new devices have exactly the same dust, splash and water resistance just like last year’s iPhone 7 models.

In other words, iPhone 8 and iPhone X are still rated IP67 under IEC standard 60529. The Korea Herald reported back in January that the new iPhones would feature increased IP68 water resistance like Samsung’s flagship Galaxy smartphones.

As a quick backgrounder, the first digit in these IP ratings determines a device’s dust proofing and the other tells you how water resistant it is. The higher the number, the better protection.

A rating of 7 means that “ingress of water in harmful quantity shall not be possible when the enclosure is immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time (up to 1 meter of submersion)” according to the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).

The digit 0 is used where no protection is provided.

By comparison, Samsung’s Galaxy S8 and Note 8 smartphones (along with the new S Pen) have slightly better IP68-rated water and dust resistance allowing them to be submerged up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes.

An excerpt from Apple’s fine print for the iPhone 8 series:

iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus are splash, water, and dust resistant and were tested under controlled laboratory conditions with a rating of IP67 under IEC standard 60529.

It’s also important to stress that splash, water and dust resistance are not permanent conditions. Furthermore, water and dust resistance might decrease as a result of normal wear.

For more info, see the tech specs for iPhone X, iPhone 8 and Apple Watch Series 3.

Apple’s internal repair guide instructs service technicians to pull apart a phone and check its internal indicator, which turns red when exposed to water, for any sings of liquid damage.

Both Wi-Fi and LTE models of Apple Watch Series 3 are water resistant up to 50 meters under ISO standard 22810:2010, just like last year’s Series 2. According to Apple, this lets you use your watch for shallow-water activities like swimming in a pool or ocean.

“Apple Watch Series 3 should not be used for scuba diving, waterskiing, or other activities involving high-velocity water or submersion below shallow depth,” reads the fine print.

The original Apple Watch has a water resistance rating of IPX7 under IEC standard 60529, but you’re advised against submerging it. Stainless steel and leather bands are not water resistant.

Again, this isn’t a big deal but is something you should keep in mind if you plan on buying an iPhone X, iPhone 8 or Apple Watch Series 3 and were hoping for increased water resistance.

Liquid damage is not covered under Apple’s standard 1-year warranty so keep that in mind, too.

  • TheAvatarNice

    That’s a bummer

  • Jamessmooth

    pretty disappointing for the X seeing as how you’re spending around 8972354908734957 for it.

  • Sailor_V90

    If I get an iPhone 8 or 8+ I think it will be a great time to try a new color, likely Gold. I’ve been getting Black and Space Grey since the iPhone 3GS. Time for a change.

  • Mikasa Ackerman

    Spend $1000 and get nothing new. Apple will flop this time. Tim, this was not enough to save your ass. You’re done for.

  • Alexander Figueroa

    Wow $1000 for a 64gb I’m gonna have to pass and keep my 7plus 128gb. I do like the Apple Watch

  • Typo: sings -> signs

  • ic0dex

    Back in my day when this site was called the iPhone Download Blog, on launch day on a post like this they would have over 100s of comments. This site is dead, why are you people here?

  • OtterWithKids

    I actually think the $999 price point is reasonable, given what the competition is charging. That doesn’t mean I’m going to get one, though. My 6 is paid off and still doing great. Planned obsolesce notwithstanding, Apple still makes some fairly long-lasting products.

  • Diego Milano

    So much high price and they can’t still cover the basics, oh well…