AppGratis rejection may point to wider App Store enforcement

By , Apr 10, 2013

AppGratis (teaser)

Apple may be preparing to scrub its App Store of companies offering to promote other apps through paid partnerships with their developers.

The removal of the AppGratis curation software from the App Store earlier this week “was the first step” by Apple to enforce the recently-announced portions of the App Store Review Guidelines, according to one tech news outlet.

And while the AppGratis teams argues this is “far from finished,” looks like the legitimacy of the App Store’s ranking feature is at stake. On the surface, it seems Apple believes it is being threatened by third-party software for iDevices designed to recommend other apps, including promoting apps via social media.

Although developers debate the meaning of two clauses in Apple’s guidelines, the iPhone and iPad maker wants to head off any confusion by consumers, the Wednesday report suggests…

John Paczkowski of AllThingsD has the scoop:

I’m told that Apple feels that these apps threaten the legitimacy of the App Store charts by providing a way for developers to spend their way to a high ranking.

In 2011, Apple made a similar move, rejecting several applications which included “incentivized” app installs, Paczkowski notes.

App Store rankings

The so-called discovery apps, such as AppGratis, which allow consumers to find other apps, “create a scenario that’s similar to walking into Nordstrom and seeing a Walmart inside,” he adds, citing a source.

In fact, Apple is now enforcing clause 10.2 in its app approval guidelines banning apps that could be confused with the apps bundled on the iPhone or included in the App Store, according to the writer.

Indeed, confusion is being produced not by Apple’s app rules, but whether they are enforced, a practice AllThingsD describes as “unclear and scattershot.”

One developer of a discovery app appears to agree with Apple’s actions.

“I do think app discovery apps which recommend apps based on some kind of journalistic merit and not a business relationship will continue to thrive,” AppAdvice co-founder Mahmoud Hafez told us by email.

Paid recommendation, though, “are on the way out, and that should be a good thing.”

  • Share:
  • Follow:
  • Brandon

    They should just sue Apple with other developers who have had their apps rejected or kicked out. App Store rules are ridiculous and too strict.

    • sleeperjoe

      What exactly are they gonna sue for?

      Well you see judge, we agreed to these rules and violated them anyway. But clearly Apple is in the wrong cause they weren’t enforcing these rules before. Yes we made millions violating the rules but that doesn’t matter.

      • Phil

        They can sue that the terms are unfair and too strict. Hopefully the judge will then make Apple change the terms and open the App Store up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/raaed.rizza.7 Raaed Rizza

    AppGratis was great, it showed me many good indie apps which deserve some recognition

  • Nelson

    I’m afraid Apple is not the same without Steve Jobs. One of silly things that makes creative developers and users switch to other devices. We need innovation, Apple, all you can do without Steve is only resizing your stuff.

  • Mohammad Ridwan

    Gettin’ real tired of you shit, Apple.

  • seyss

    the rule is fine.. the problem is apple let Appgratis become a company with CEO, 55 employees and THEN killed it. they should’ve killed it on day one to avoid that

  • http://www.facebook.com/anh.undine Anh Undine

    German Apps ftw!