iWatch C (Martin Hajek 002)

According to the latest supply chain chatter, Apple’s unannounced iWatch wearable device is facing production difficulty stemming from weak yields.

The point at issue here is that the surface finish treatments dealing with the device’s body are reportedly showing unexpectedly low yield rates of less than 50 percent.

Needless to say, that’s totally unacceptable for mass production.

According to a report coming straight out of Taiwan where the bulk of Apple’s component suppliers and manufacturers are located, both the iPhone maker and the chip giant Qualcomm – which is also pursuing a smartwatch of its own – are finding it difficult to produce tiny wearable devices using metal injection molding (MIM)…

According to a report filed Thursday by DigiTimes:

Several wearable devices such as Apple’s iWatch and Qualcomm’s Toq are reportedly seeing less than 50% yield rates due to difficulties applying surface treatments on their metal injection molded (MIM) chassis, according to sources from the upstream supply chain.

Metal injection molding is a a metalworking process that involves mixing finely-powdered metal with a measured amount of binder material. The process lends itself nicely to manufacture of high-precision tiny parts that feature intricate designs.

On the downside, current production technology is limiting these molds to volumes of up to a hundred grams. Typically, MIM-made components reside inside products.

With the iWatch, however, some of these internal components have now become part of the external design, according to DigiTimes. As a result, additional surface treatments is required to give these MIM-made parts the shininess you’d expect from Apple.

“Since clients have high demand over quality, and also need high volumes of supply, most component makers are having difficulties satisfying both of requirements,” the publication remarks.

C Technology, the somewhat reliable Chinese blog, recently asserted that Apple is aiming for an October 2014 iWatch introduction. Apparently the firm has tested at least two iWatch prototypes with wireless charging capability.

DisplaySearch thinks there will be two iWatch sizes, one aimed at men with a 1.7-inch screen and the other for women with a display measuring 1.3 inches diagonally.

CEO Tim Cook hinted Apple fans should expect “exciting new products from us” in 2014, with Bloomberg writing nine months ago that early iWatch prototypes ran iOS and featured sensors that would measure your heart rate and blood pressure.

Bloomberg’s description alludes to the iWatch being a health/fitness wearable device of sorts rather than your typical smartwatch.

At any rate, expect the market for wearable devices to explode in 2014 as companies like Qualcomm, Sony, Samsung Electronics, Pebble, Casio, Nike, Adidas, Epson and LG gear up to release new wearable gadgets.

With CES 2014 lurking around the corner (January 7-10), I’m sure there will be plenty of smartwatch announcements to get excited about.

iWatch C rendering top of post via Martin Hajek.

  • Ben

    Hmm…

  • Ben

    I’m so gonna buy one if/when it comes out.

    • Snailpo

      Yeah i don’t know why, but i feel i need one.

      • box office

        That’s probably because you’re addicted to apple products …. I have that too

  • Tony

    Well if it’s not going to be more of a smartwatch then I’m out. But then again the price is what is going to ultimately break it. Anything over 150.00 would be a joke as you can get other apple devices for 200 to 300 that do more.

    • Lhu

      It should worth <= than an apple TV

  • onebyone_

    iWatch, iWatch[s] (with retina), iWatch Air (“with the first fingerprint sensor on screen”).
    just thinking about the future names for this device

  • Gbruno

    I dunno. I kinda love my pebble.

    • Rowan09

      I bought one as well and I love it especially when exercising using run keeper and 5K app. I would have been interested in the Gear if it was available for IOS products and cheaper than $300, I just believe they tried to put too much on a watch especially the camera addition. If they could have gotten rid of the microphone for picking up calls and the camera to make it at $199 I would have probably checked one out.