Apple licenses $10 million worth of patents filed by Palm and others

By , Apr 10, 2013

access_banner

This is kind of interesting. Access, a Japan-based software company, published a release on its website this morning noting that it had entered a licensing agreement with Apple for a number of its patents. The firm’s portfolio is quite large, featuring IP from Bell, Palm and others.

The particular patents that Apple is said to have acquired the rights to came from PalmSource, the company behind Palm’s original mobile operating system. In 2003, it spun off of Palm as an independent company, and in 2005, Access acquired it and its intelectual property…

According to the press release, first spotted by Macotakara, Apple paid a $1B Yen for the patents. A quick search in Google tells us that’s just a little bit more than $10 million USD. That’s obviously just a drop in the bucket for Apple, who has over $140B in cash, but it’s noteworthy.

Interestingly enough, as 9to5Mac points out, some of these Palm patents that Apple has licensed are likely the ones that Steve Jobs referred to as ‘worthless’ in an email exchange with Palm’s CEO Ed Colligan back in 2007. The email surfaced earlier this year in a civil suit hearing.

Apple has been very active in licensing technology over the past year. Late last year, it reached a monumental cross-licensing deal with HTC that effectively ended all of their standing lawsuits. And earlier this year, it was part of a consortium that purchased 1,100 patents from Kodak.

  • Share:
  • Follow:
  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.jonsen Joe Jonsen

    good to see apple doing things the right way now lets see if samsung will follow and do it too…lol

    • http://www.facebook.com/tafk1 Taf Khan

      Samsung only know how to copy.. Tut tut

  • http://twitter.com/aidanharris1 ✪ aidan harris ✪

    The patents might very well be “useless” but I’m sure they’ll be a good asset to Apple allowing them to refuse other companies access to these and sue them if they do

  • http://twitter.com/andrewr727 Andrew Roth

    Steve Jobs was about innovation and doing business right. Tim Cook is about being a millionaire who doesn’t care about anybody but him. Steve Jobs was much better. He actually introduced good new features. Don’t get me wrong, some of the new features are good. Nothing Earth shattering or too innovating though. They’re also good at brainwashing people to take anything. The lightning wire upgrade rendered thousands of accessories useless. Apple still found a way to make it seem like it was good for us, when really all it was was an excuse for people to have to buy more accessories from them.

  • Mysteroy3k

    This is how u suppose to do it Samsung , take notes