Battery concerns reportedly delay cellular-enabled Apple Watch 2

By , Aug 18, 2016

Apple Watch side

Bloomberg just shot down The Wall Street Journal’s claim of a cellular-enabled Apple Watch 2, saying it’s been delayed over battery concerns and technological limitations. Instead, Apple Watch 2 models, which Bloomberg’s well-informed Mark Gurman says are coming this fall, will improve health tracking with an on-board GPS chip.

While the Apple Watch 2 won’t be a truly standalone device, it’ll “integrate GPS-based location tracking”. In addition to tracking running and walking distances more precisely, GPS would improve the accuracy of data submitted to Apple’s Health app and make navigation on the watch more accurate, sources said.

The report says carriers have been urging Apple to release a watch with cellular access. The firm “had been in talks this year with mobile phone carriers in the U.S. and Europe” to add cellular connectivity to the device, reads the article.

During the discussions, Apple executives expressed concern that the cellular models may not be ready for release this year and that the feature may be pushed back to a later generation, according to the people. Apple warned that, even on an aggressive schedule, the earliest possible shipment time-frame for cellular models would have been this December, one of the people said.

I’m not sure why all the fuss about cellular-enabled watches.

Having briefly tested a few of them, it’s clear that cellular access is a huge battery drain for such small form-factor gadgets with tiny batteries in them. I’m not saying cellular watches make no sense: it is true that cellular connectivity would let watch wearers retrieve latest sports scores, weather and mapping information, emails and other alerts while out of an iPhone’s reach.

The question is, how often do Apple Watch owners leave home without an iPhone in their pocket? I understand having an Apple Watch with an embedded cellular chip would make it more practical to hit the gym or go on a run without carrying a heavier, bulkier iPhone in their pocket, but these are very specific use cases.

I have no doubt in my mind that carriers would love to see a cellular-enabled Apple Watch to upsell existing iPhone customers to their smartwatch data add-ons. The thing is, I, like many users, want to avoid at all costs another contract on top of one I already have.

Even if the original Apple Watch came with cellular features, I don’t think I would’ve signed up for a new data plan just for it because I’m perfectly fine with the watch connecting to the Internet through my iPhone’s cellular connection while on the go.

This is just my personal opinion and I could be easily wrong.

After all, Bloomberg states that “While the plan for this year had been to at least partially untether the watch from the iPhone, Apple’s ultimate goal is to eliminate any need to connect the two devices,” so there’s that.

And your two cents?

Source: Bloomberg

  • Share:
  • Follow:
  • Newgunnerr

    I just want it to drop i’ve been waiting so long!!!

  • Jamessmooth

    I’m fine with no cell connectivity. Better battery and gps is fine with me. (Added bonus would be waterproof) I’d like to be able to go more than a day without charging it!

  • Chindavon

    I just don’t get all the fuss about having cellular on a smart watch. How many times really, are you without your phone near by? Jogging or Exercising perhaps? If so, when you’re doing those things, do you need to be texting, making phone calls, or catch up on social media during these taks? Pointless, and a wast of $ tacking on a data charge for a smartwatch.

  • :D

    One UK carrier offers 100 MB data for free each month with no contracts. Would’ve been great with the Apple Watch.

    The option to disable cellular connections would probably eliminate or at least vastly mitigate any battery concerns for those who don’t use it.

  • askep3

    Wait hold up, I don’t give a crap about cellular connectivity cuz all it is is a battery drain and space waster, I’ll be taking my phone everywhere I take my Apple Watch.

    Is the only thing that’s coming to the new one GPS? Because it’s just as useless if not more than cellular for me, is it not going to be a bit thinner or anything like that? At least have the processor much more powerful

  • AndreG

    I really am happy with my Apple Watch Sport. All this talk about being able to use it w/o your iPhone. For WHAT!! It’s a great fitness tool, weather check, calendar, send a quick short text and of course a watch. Once watch os3 drops, which it will make it faster, who could ask for anything more. I just hope Apple doesn’t pull a fast one on us with the Apple Watch 2 by switching the band sizes.

  • Leslie B

    My current Apple Watch is all I need, and the last thing I’d want to add is something that drained the battery faster, like gps or a camera or something else that’s already part of my iPhone!!

  • Skye

    Make it low profile like myKronoz and increase battery life I’ll buy one as many will

  • Anonymous

    I’m with you I don’t care about there cellular part… my phone is already with me. Give me more faces, type of metals, and health features please!